Our energy advice for businesses during times of market volati...
Leyton helps businesses cut energy costs and simplify energy management. From audits and compensa...

In a recent capital allowances case, The Mersey Docks and Harbour Company Limited secured a significant legal victory against HMRC at a First Tier Tribunal concerning capital allowances for the construction of a quay wall at the Port of Liverpool.
The case ([2024] UKFTT 001163 (TC)), centred on whether the £57.13m expenditure, incurred in the appellants 31 March 2015 to 31 March 2018 accounting periods, on the construction of a quay wall at the container terminal, qualified for plant and machinery allowances (PMAs) under the CAA 2001.
HMRC contended that the expenditure incurred would not be treated as expenditure on the provision of plant or machinery and therefore tax relief would be denied.
The tribunal had to address three tests to reach its decision:
After appeal, it was found that the STS cranes, a key part of The Mersey Docks and Harbour Company Limited’s trade, could not function without the quay wall. With all three tests being met, the quay wall was held to be a distinct item in which expenditure had been incurred on the provision of plant or machinery as defined in CAA 2001 s23, List C Item 1.
Our specialist team of capital allowances experts can provide advice and support to ensure you are making the most of capital allowances.
If you enjoyed this article, you might also like:
Explore our latest insights

Leyton helps businesses cut energy costs and simplify energy management. From audits and compensa...

Explore how AI innovators in the UK can overcome R&D challenges and boost innovation through ...

How to Turn Carbon Reporting and Compliance into a Competitive Business Advantage

Leveraging Capital Allowances to strengthen business resilience and reduce tax