South Carolina Supreme Court Reviews $12M Amazon Sales Tax Dispute

  • By Allison Mims
    • May 15, 2025
    • read
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin

Overview of the Amazon sales tax Supreme Court case

Amazon is currently facing a pivotal legal challenge before the South Carolina Supreme Court that could reshape the sales tax landscape for online marketplaces. At issue is whether Amazon owes over $12 million in sales taxes, penalties, and interest for failing to collect tax on third-party seller transactions during Q1 of 2016, after its exemption expired at the end of 2015.

South Carolina Supreme Court on Tax Collection

The South Carolina Department of Revenue contends that Amazon exercised sufficient control over these transactions to warrant tax collection responsibility.

Lower Court Rulings and Potential Exposure

Lower courts have ruled in favor of the state. If the Supreme Court affirms those decisions, Amazon could be liable for more than $277 million in additional taxes for subsequent years. The case is especially significant because it addresses marketplace facilitator liability prior to South Carolina’s enactment of its facilitator law in 2019 and the U.S. Supreme Court’s Wayfair decision in 2018, which expanded states’ ability to require remote sellers to collect sales tax.

Implications for Marketplace Facilitators

This case has broad implications for online marketplaces and could set a powerful precedent on the retroactive application of tax obligations. A ruling against Amazon may open the door for similar enforcement actions by other states seeking to recoup sales tax revenue from pre-Wayfair periods. Online platforms and third-party sellers alike should monitor this case closely, as it may redefine historical liability in the rapidly evolving e-commerce tax environment.

Why This Amazon Sales Tax Supreme Court Case Matters

The outcome could allow states to retroactively pursue sales tax from online platforms and sellers. If you sell through marketplaces like Amazon, states may take the same approach as SC and begin auditing past sales periods, increasing the risk where businesses could face surprise tax liabilities. Not all states interpret marketplace roles the same way. This case my not put tax directly in your lap today, but it opens the door for audits, raising seller fees and tightening contractual terms. 

If you have any further questions, talk to one of our SALT experts!

Author

Allison Mims

State and Local Tax Attorney

Explore our latest insights

See more arrow_forward
Tax credit for AI
Using AI vs. Building AI: What actually qualifies for R&D ...

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming industries at an unprecedented pace. From predictive...

EU VAT
EU VAT in the Digital Age: ViDA Explained

The biggest change to EU VAT in 30 years is no longer coming. It is already here. Is your busines...

Sales Tax Compliance
Sales Tax Compliance: The Critical Role of Exemption Certifica...

In the United States, businesses selling goods or services must generally collect sales tax on tr...

Washington Removes Sales Tax Exemptions for Data Center Equipm...

Washington has enacted legislation under Washington Senate Bill 6231 that eliminates ke...