Section 1245 and 1250: Understanding Depreciation Recapture fo...
Navigating the complexities of tax law in real estate can be challenging, even for experienced in...
Massachusetts has introduced a major change to its corporate tax code that impacts software developers. The Massachusetts Department of Revenue’s Technical Information Release (TIR) 23-8 now classifies computer software developers as manufacturing companies for corporate excise tax purposes. Companies that develop and sell access to software allowing customers to input information, manipulate the software, and run reports independently are now considered sellers of tangible personal property. Consequently, these companies must use a single-sales factor method of apportionment for their corporate excise tax returns, rather than the traditional three-factor method that includes property, payroll, and sales.
This change follows the Massachusetts Appellate Tax Board’s 2021 ruling in Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue. The board determined that Akamai Technologies qualifies as a manufacturing corporation due to its revenue from developing and selling standardized computer software accessed remotely. As a result, software developers involved in creating and selling standardized computer software, whether downloaded or accessed via the cloud, should review their corporate excise tax returns to ensure they are using the correct apportionment method.
Massachusetts law continues to evolve, potentially allowing more businesses to qualify for manufacturing corporation status. Companies may be entitled to significant state tax benefits and refunds for taxes paid in prior years. Leyton experts are ready to provide guidance and support to your business by reviewing your in-state activities and determining if it qualifies for these benefits.
Explore our latest insights
See more arrow_forwardNavigating the complexities of tax law in real estate can be challenging, even for experienced in...
The South Carolina Supreme Court recently invalidated a sales tax statute under the Commerce Clau...
In Uline, Inc. v. Commissioner (Minn., No. A23-1561, 2024), the court determined the market resea...
On August 8, 2024, the IRS provided an update on the status of Employee Retention Tax Credit (“ER...