Manitoba Budget 2026: A Strategic Roadmap for Growth
On March 24th, 2026, the provincial government tabled the Manitoba budget 2026, signaling a major...

Quebec’s March 25, 2025 budget consolidated innovation funding into two main programs: CDAE and CRIC. Understanding the difference between CDAEIA vs CRIC determines whether your company recovers 30% or 65% of R&D costs.
| Tax Credit | CDAEIA | CRIC |
|---|---|---|
| Target | IT companies with AI integration | Any company conducting R&D |
| Rate | 30% (23% refundable, 7% non-refundable in 2025) | 30% for SMEs, 15% for large corps |
| Eligible costs | Salaries only | Salaries + Subcontractors’ costs + 3rd party payments + Equipment for the purpose of R&D |
| Minimum employees | 6 eligible full-time | No minimum |
| Revenue Tests | 75/50/75% thresholds required | None |
| AI requirement | Must significantly integrate AI (2026+) | Must demonstrate technological uncertainty |
| Salary cap | No cap, $18,571 exclusion per employee | $50,000 or the total of the threshold related to R&D employees and the threshold relation to pre-commercialization employees (whichever is greater) |
Eligible if your company:
Critical 2026 change: Activities must significantly integrate AI functionality. AI cannot be cosmetic; it must substantially modify system performance or processes.
Rate reduction: If 50%+ of revenue comes from related-party services for applications used exclusively outside Quebec, the rate drops to 15%.
Software company with 10 employees averaging $120,000 salary:
CRIC replaced Quebec’s previous SR&ED provincial credits. Fully refundable for SMEs.
Eligible expenditures:
Rates:
Exclusion threshold: Greater of $50,000 or basic personal amount ($18,751 in 2025) per employee, prorated by R&D time.
CRIC now covers equipment, a major shift. Manufacturing, robotics, and hardware companies gain a significant advantage.
Exemple: A $500,000 equipment purchased for the purpose of R&D generates $150,000 immediate credit (provincial), stackable with federal SR&ED.
Most companies don’t choose; they claim both. The question is optimization.
Pure Software Development Shop
Profile: Saas company, 20 developers, minimal equipment costs.
Strategy: Maximize CDAEIA for full salary coverage. Layer CRIC on R&D activities addressing technological uncertainty.
Combined recovery: Up to 65% when stacking with federal SR&ED (35%)
Hardware-Software Hybrid
Profile: Robotics firm, significant equipment purchases, custom software development.
Strategy: Prioritize CRIC for equipment credits. CDAEIA may not apply if revenue tests fail.
IT Services Consultant
Critical issue: If most work is for related entities, CDAEIA won’t apply. For CRIC on client work, you must retain intellectual property (IP) rights.
Documentation becomes critical: Without proper IP ownership, neither program applies to billable projects
CDAEIA suits IT companies with clear AI integration and arm’s-length client revenue.
CRIC fits any business conducting systematic R&D to resolve technological uncertainty, especially valuable for equipment-intensive operations.
Both together: Properly structured companies recover 65% of R&D costs when combining provincial programs with federal SR&ED.
The difference between reactive claiming and strategic planning: $200,000+ annually for mid-sized tech companies.
Contact one of our experts today to maximize funding from both credits for your company!
Explore our latest insights
More arrow_forward
On March 24th, 2026, the provincial government tabled the Manitoba budget 2026, signaling a major...

On March 18, 2026, the Government of Québec tabled the Québec budget 2026-2027. Prioritizing publ...

The recently tabled Saskatchewan 2026 provincial budget outlines a challenging fiscal path, with ...

When most people think of R&D, they picture breakthroughs in aerospace, pharmaceuticals, or a...