Navigating Federal SR&ED and Innovation Incentives in 2026
With the start of 2026, the landscape for Canadian innovation funding has fundamentally shifted. ...

Quebec’s March 25, 2025 budget consolidated innovation funding into two main programs: CDAE and CRIC. Understanding the difference between CDAEIA vs CRIC determines whether your company recovers 30% or 65% of R&D costs.
| Tax Credit | CDAEIA | CRIC |
|---|---|---|
| Target | IT companies with AI integration | Any company conducting R&D |
| Rate | 30% (23% refundable, 7% non-refundable in 2025) | 30% for SMEs, 15% for large corps |
| Eligible costs | Salaries only | Salaries + Subcontractors’ costs + 3rd party payments + Equipment for the purpose of R&D |
| Minimum employees | 6 eligible full-time | No minimum |
| Revenue Tests | 75/50/75% thresholds required | None |
| AI requirement | Must significantly integrate AI (2026+) | Must demonstrate technological uncertainty |
| Salary cap | No cap, $18,571 exclusion per employee | $50,000 or the total of the threshold related to R&D employees and the threshold relation to pre-commercialization employees (whichever is greater) |
Eligible if your company:
Critical 2026 change: Activities must significantly integrate AI functionality. AI cannot be cosmetic; it must substantially modify system performance or processes.
Rate reduction: If 50%+ of revenue comes from related-party services for applications used exclusively outside Quebec, the rate drops to 15%.
Software company with 10 employees averaging $120,000 salary:
CRIC replaced Quebec’s previous SR&ED provincial credits. Fully refundable for SMEs.
Eligible expenditures:
Rates:
Exclusion threshold: Greater of $50,000 or basic personal amount ($18,751 in 2025) per employee, prorated by R&D time.
CRIC now covers equipment, a major shift. Manufacturing, robotics, and hardware companies gain a significant advantage.
Exemple: A $500,000 equipment purchased for the purpose of R&D generates $150,000 immediate credit (provincial), stackable with federal SR&ED.
Most companies don’t choose; they claim both. The question is optimization.
Pure Software Development Shop
Profile: Saas company, 20 developers, minimal equipment costs.
Strategy: Maximize CDAEIA for full salary coverage. Layer CRIC on R&D activities addressing technological uncertainty.
Combined recovery: Up to 65% when stacking with federal SR&ED (35%)
Hardware-Software Hybrid
Profile: Robotics firm, significant equipment purchases, custom software development.
Strategy: Prioritize CRIC for equipment credits. CDAEIA may not apply if revenue tests fail.
IT Services Consultant
Critical issue: If most work is for related entities, CDAEIA won’t apply. For CRIC on client work, you must retain intellectual property (IP) rights.
Documentation becomes critical: Without proper IP ownership, neither program applies to billable projects
CDAEIA suits IT companies with clear AI integration and arm’s-length client revenue.
CRIC fits any business conducting systematic R&D to resolve technological uncertainty, especially valuable for equipment-intensive operations.
Both together: Properly structured companies recover 65% of R&D costs when combining provincial programs with federal SR&ED.
The difference between reactive claiming and strategic planning: $200,000+ annually for mid-sized tech companies.
Contact one of our experts today to maximize funding from both credits for your company!
Explore our latest insights
More arrow_forward
With the start of 2026, the landscape for Canadian innovation funding has fundamentally shifted. ...

Smart contracts execute deterministic logic on blockchains, providing immutability, auditability ...

In today’s interconnected economy, the path to rapid growth lies beyond domestic borders. Interna...

While gauging the SR&ED eligibility of our clients’ projects, we often find that they are afr...