{"id":931,"date":"2025-08-21T09:39:37","date_gmt":"2025-08-21T09:39:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/leyton.majjane.agency\/ie\/insights\/articles\/new-determination-on-rd-tax-credits-rules-for-software-development-projects\/"},"modified":"2026-08-20T13:04:01","modified_gmt":"2026-08-20T11:04:01","slug":"new-determination-on-rd-tax-credits-rules-for-software-development-projects","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"https:\/\/leyton.com\/ie\/insights\/articles\/new-determination-on-rd-tax-credits-rules-for-software-development-projects\/","title":{"rendered":"New determination on R&D Tax Credits rules for software development projects"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

When is a software development project routine, and when is it genuinely innovative and deserving of R&D Tax Credits<\/a>?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The question was put to the test recently, when an Irish IT services company (mostly) won a Tax Appeals Commission case against Revenue. The case centred around whether or not the company\u2019s expenditure on developing a new \u2018aggregated service desk\u2019 and portal qualified as R&D for tax purposes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The full determination can be found on the Tax Appeals<\/a>\u2019 website. It makes for interesting reading, especially for anyone working on innovative software development projects of their own.\u2028

Below, we provide an overview of the case and its implications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What was Revenue\u2019s case for refusing the claims?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The claimant company had tried to claim 25% of the project\u2019s qualifying expenditure, which came to \u20ac86,011 for their R&D work in 2012, and \u20ac117,803 in 2013, but Revenue refused both of the claims, arguing that the project failed to meet the definition of R&D for tax purposes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Revenue\u2019s definition says that a project must:<\/p>\n\n\n\n